- Visibility 395 Views
- Downloads 299 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.jmra.2024.002
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Working capital management strategies and financial performance: A cause-and-effect analysis
Abstract
This study attempts to validate whether the working capital management strategies can be considered as the causes of good or bad financial performance of an organization, particularly in Indian cement industry. Whether the decisions of finance managers of Indian cement companies concerning the components of working capital such as account receivables, inventory, accounts paybles, cash holding etc. affect the firm’s performance individually and in total, a sample of 31 Indian cement companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange are being selected and their financial statements are analyzed for a period of 11-years (2010-2020). The findings of Pearson’s correlation coefficient and random effect regression model analysis show that there exists a negative relationship between financial performance measured in terms of return on assets (ROA) and inventory turnover period (ITP) as well as accounts payable period (APP). In contrast, a firm’s performance is not significantly affected by the accounts receivable period (ARP) and cash conversion cycle (CCC). Similarly, it has been observed that liquidity ratios such as current ratio (CR) and quick ratio (QR) have a significant positive association with ROA. Moreover, the size of the firms and leverage are inversely related to ROA but the age of the firms is not significantly affecting their financial performances.
Introduction
The ultimate aim of working capital management is to prevent either over investing or under investing in the current assets of a company since both have negative effects. Due to the cost of financing, excess investment in current assets may result in lower profitability due to unproductive use of funds and similarly under investment in current assets may pose a threat to the liquidity of the organization. Effective management of working capital is regarded as one of the most critical tasks for finance managers, as a significant portion of the money is tied up in current assets in actual practice. Smooth management of working capital is essential for any organization whether it is manufacturing, service, or retail for maintaining good financial health since it ensures a balance between the company's liquidity and profitability.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] Managing working capital requires maintaining liquidity on a daily basis in business operations to ensure that regular financial commitments are met. Financial Managers face complex challenges in ensuring that the company operates in a well-organized manner by maintaining the required liquidity with desired profit as well. The disparity in current assets and current liabilities has a negative impact on a company's growth and competitive advantage especially in the case of industries where many big players exist in the market. Therefore, the importance of WCM in corporate finance cannot be underestimated due to its potential impact on the liquidity and profitability of the company. Having gone through a number of studies conducted on working capital management in Indian industries and a lot of interactions and deliberations with many finance managers managing working capital on a day-to-day basis, the researcher found that working capital management is one of the least used concepts for practical managerial decision-making. When we tried to find out these working capital issues in Indian industries, it was observed that the problem is more acute in the cement industry as, except a few, many small-sized companies are struggling with working capital problems. It was the basic reason that motivated the researcher to conduct a study on the Indian cement industry. Preliminary studies showed that many of the firms had inappropriate working capital management policies.[16], [17], [18], [19], [20] This resulted in several problems, both internal and external, that this research study uses as the main research background. Internally:
(a) Holding inappropriate levels of working capital – resulting in uncontrolled costs of holding the working capital items or deficient working capital levels.
(b) Inappropriately managing working capital - their purchases and sales activities have a defective credit policy.
To sum up, it was evident that the problems that the Indian cement companies face with respect to working capital management must be of one or more of the following types;
Difficult to manage day-to-day activities without sufficient working capital
Sometimes, the company may have to give up many market opportunities such as cash discounts and bulk lower prices on products, because of a lack of availability of ready working capital.
The company could lose out on its creditworthiness, as it will be unable to pay off its obligations when it matures.
Chances are that the company may lose excellent investment and expansion opportunities due to insufficient working capital.
It is observed that firms often struggle to focus on improving working capital because other priorities are competing for attention and each stakeholder is likely to have a different perspective on how to enhance working capital and their priorities.
Research Problem
Based on the above outcomes, we found three major research problems normally faced by the Indian cement industry. First of all, it is a fast-growing industry and a lot of small players are there who are not listed on the stock exchange creating intense competition. In such a situation, efficient management of working capital, and the adoption of effective working capital policy become more important to maintain profitability and market share. Secondly, the trend or practices of working capital policy in the small- and large-scale cement companies in the Bombay Stock Exchange were not clear because of the lack of research on this particular issue. Thus, it is high time to identify whether an aggressive or conservative working capital policy is suitable for small-size cement industries. Third, working capital management ratios, cash conversion cycle, etc. have been studied by many researchers while establishing a relationship between working capital management and profitability. However, in the case of the cement industries, the use of the determinants of working capital management is discrete by not providing any concrete outcome for the role of each proxy variable of working capital management in influencing firms' performance.
Review of Literature
Earlier studies on this topic have analysed the importance of working capital from a range of various viewpoints such as the importance of optimum inventory management, the best approach to managing accounts receivable in order to maximise profits etc. Although many studies were conducted on the relationship between working capital management and the financial performance of manufacturing industries in different countries, the research on the impact of working capital management on firms' profitability in the Indian context and that too on the cement industry, in particular, is very limited and hardly any study has extensively been carried out to analyse the importance of optimum utilization of working capital and its impact on a firm’s profitability particularly with respect to Indian cement companies. The data collected from the previous studies on this area by various researchers are presented in the form of a table as given below which provides a concise view of the prior studies exclusively dealing with the relationship between the determinants of working capital and financial profitability in the cement industries.([Table 1] )[21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]
Author |
Country |
No of Companies |
Financial year |
CR |
QR |
ARP |
APP |
ITP |
CCC |
DV |
Almazari (2014) |
Saudi Arab |
8 |
2008-2012 |
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
ROA |
Angahar and Alematu (2014) |
Nigeria |
4 |
2002-2009 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
+ |
ROA |
Dhar (2018), |
Bangladesh |
7 |
2007-2015 |
|
|
- |
+ |
- |
- |
GPR |
Hoque et al., (2015) |
Bangladesh |
6 |
2010-2012 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
NPR ROA |
Kawakibi & Hadiwidjojo (2019) |
Indonesia |
6 |
2012-2017 |
|
|
- |
- |
+ |
|
ROA |
Nwude et al., (2020) |
Nigeria |
3 |
2007-2018 |
|
|
+ |
- |
- |
|
ROA |
Pandey and Sabamaithiy (2016) |
India |
24 |
2003-2013 |
+ |
+ |
|
|
|
|
ROI |
Panigrahy, (2020) |
India |
30 |
2006-2015 |
|
|
+ |
- |
- |
- |
ROA |
Quayyum, (2011) |
Bangladesh |
6 |
2005-2009 |
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
NPR, ROA |
Rehman and Anjum (2013) |
India |
10 |
2003-2008 |
- |
- |
|
+ |
|
|
ROA |
Sarwat et al., (2017) |
Pakistan |
18 |
2007-2011 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
ROA |
Shahzad et al., (2015) |
Pakistan |
7 |
2007-2013 |
+ |
- |
|
|
|
|
ROA |
Wanguu and Kipkirui (2015) |
Kenya |
3 |
2000-2014 |
|
|
|
- |
+ |
|
ROA |
Yasir et al., (2014) |
Pakistan |
16 |
2007-2012 |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
ROA |
Research Methodology
Data and samples
The target population for this research is made up of all the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) listed cement manufacturing companies located in the Indian sub-continent. The sample cement companies were selected based on a few criteria. First of all, it has been ensured that the selected company should be a legal entity, filing their annual return to the register of companies, Govt. of India and should be listed in BSE. It has since been confirmed that the selected company should have 11 years of financial data starting from 2010 to 2020. Those companies not having the last 11 years of data were purposefully excluded from the sample. Thus, the sampling technique adopted in this research is purposive sampling. As the population is limited and countable, the study tried to include as many companies as possible provided they are satisfying the selection criteria. The final sample contains 31 cement companies with 11 years of financial data resulting in 341 Company-year panel data. The required data for study purposes were collected from the websites of moneycontrol.com and BSE.[31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39] All necessary required information for study purposes relating to the nature of the company, size, age, state and region, company background, value of total assets and annual financial statements of these companies for the period 2010 to 2020 have been obtained from this database.([Table 2] )
Company code |
Company Name |
Establishment Year |
State |
Sector |
Type |
1. ACC |
ACC Ltd. |
1936 |
Maharashtra |
Cement |
Major |
2. Ambuja |
Ambuja Cements |
1981 |
Gujarat |
Cement |
Major |
3. APCL |
Anjani Portland Cement ltd. |
1983 |
Maharashtra |
Cement |
Mini |
4. Birla |
BIRLA CORPORATION LTD. |
1910 |
West Bengal |
Cement |
Major |
5. Burnpur |
Burnpur Cement |
1986 |
West Bengal |
Cement |
Major |
6. BVCL |
Barak Vally Cement Ltd. |
1999 |
Assam |
Cement |
Major |
7. Deccane |
Deccan Cements |
1979 |
Telangana |
Cement |
Mini |
8. GSCL Cement |
Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. |
1973 |
Gujarat |
Cement |
Major |
9. Heidelberg |
Heidelberg Cement |
1954 |
Haryana |
Cement |
Major |
10. Indiacem |
India Cements |
1946 |
Tamil Nadu |
Cement |
Major |
11. JK Cement |
J. K. Cement |
1975 |
Uttar Pradesh |
Cement |
Major |
12. JK Lakshmi |
JK Lakshmi Cement |
1938 |
Rajasthan |
Cement |
Major |
13. Kakatcem |
Kakatiya Cement |
1979 |
Andhra Pradesh |
Cement |
Mini |
14. KCP |
KCP Ltd. |
1941 |
Tamil Nadu |
Cement |
Major |
15. Keerthi |
Keerthi Ind |
1982 |
Andhra Pradesh |
Cement |
Mini |
16. KUL |
Katwa Udyog Ltd |
1993 |
Karnataka |
Cement |
Mini |
17. Manglamcem |
Mangalam Cement |
1976 |
Rajasthan |
Cement |
Major |
18. NCLIND |
NCL Industries |
1980 |
Telangana |
cement |
Mini |
19. NIRAJ |
Niraj Cement |
1972 |
Maharashtra |
Cement |
Mini |
20. PRSMJOHNSN |
Prism Johnson Ltd |
1992 |
Telangana |
cement |
Major |
21. RAININD |
Rain Industries Ltd. |
1974 |
Telangana |
Cement |
Mini |
22. RAMCO |
Ramco Cements |
1961 |
Tamil Nadu |
cement |
Major |
23. SAGAR |
Sagar Cement |
1981 |
Telangana |
cement |
Mini |
24. SAINIK |
Sainik Finance & Industries Ltd |
1991 |
New Delhi |
Cement |
Mini |
25. SAURASHCEM |
Saurashtra Cement |
1956 |
Gujarat |
Cement |
Major |
26. SCANPRO |
Scan Projects Ltd |
1992 |
Haryana |
Cement |
Mini |
27. SHIVACEM |
Shiva Cement |
1985 |
Orissa |
Cement |
Mini |
28. SHREDIGCEM |
Shree Digvijay |
1944 |
Gujarat |
Cement |
Major |
29. SHREECEM |
Shree Cements |
1979 |
Rajasthan |
Cement |
Major |
30. STARCEM |
Star Cement |
2001 |
Meghalaya |
Cement |
Major |
31. ULTRATEC |
UltraTech Cement |
1983 |
Maharashtra |
Cement |
Major |
Research Variables and Techniques
The entire study was conducted using generally accepted techniques of Descriptive Statistics Analysis. The selection and measurement of the dependent, independent and control variables were done according to some prior studies, which are presented in the ([Table 3]).
Variables |
Definition |
Estimation |
Dependent Variables |
||
ROA |
Return on Assets |
EBIT/Average Assets |
Independent Variables |
||
ITP |
Inventory Turnover Period |
(Inventory/COGS) x 365 Days |
ARP |
Accounts Receivables Period |
(Accounts Receivable/Sales) x 365 Days |
APP |
Accounts Payable Period |
(Accounts Payable/Purchases) x 365 Days |
CCC |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
ITP+ ARP-APP |
CR |
Current Ratio or WCR |
Current Asset/Current Liability |
QR |
Quick Ratio |
Liquid Asset/Current Liability |
Control Variables |
||
LCS |
Firm Size |
Log (Total Assets) |
LCA |
Firms Age |
Log (Age in Years) |
LEV |
Leverage |
Total Financial Debt / Total Assets |
LOC |
Location of the firm |
1=East, 2= North, 3=West, 4=South |
Empirical Analysis
Descriptive statistics of the variables included in the study have been presented in the ([Table 4]), The descriptive analysis includes information relating to the measures of central tendency including standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, minimum and maximum values in the variables. The research analysis includes the dependent variable; ROA and other independent variables which measure the working capital management and liquidity position of the selected companies, and four control variables that are industry-specific and need to be controlled while verifying the impact of independent variables on the dependent variables. The other two variables include the year of establishment of the companies and the financial years for which data has been collected for the analysis. It found that the establishment year of selected cement companies lies between 1910 to 2001 with a mode of 1979 and, mean 1972. This indicates that most of the companies were established during the late 1900 century. Based on the financial year data, it is evident that the study included 11 years of data for the financial year starting from 2010 to 2020. The ROA of the cement companies shows a mean value of 0.051, a standard deviation of 0.079 which is slightly different from the average ROA of individual companies given in Table-IV. As such, the ROA of the companies ranges from -0.2 to 0.5.
Variables |
Mean |
Median |
Mode |
SD |
Skewness |
Kurtosis |
Min |
Max |
EST |
1972 |
1979 |
1979 |
21.051 |
-1.06 |
0.593 |
1910 |
2001 |
FY |
2015 |
2015 |
2010a |
3.167 |
0.00 |
-1.22 |
2010 |
2020 |
ROA |
0.051 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.079 |
1.340 |
7.289 |
-0.20 |
0.50 |
ITP |
43.596 |
37.44 |
0.00 |
32.249 |
2.368 |
8.233 |
0.00 |
238.25 |
ACP |
40.466 |
18.67 |
4.31a |
69.958 |
4.226 |
22.871 |
0.00 |
641.13 |
APP |
35.693 |
27.74 |
0.00 |
43.769 |
9.256 |
125.954 |
0.00 |
664.22 |
CCC |
48.369 |
30.64 |
-0.99a |
75.274 |
0.937 |
15.417 |
-498.69 |
523.54 |
CR |
1.367 |
1.14 |
0.68a |
0.919 |
2.289 |
7.462 |
0.07 |
6.54 |
QR |
0.605 |
0.46 |
0.40 |
0.565 |
2.926 |
11.417 |
0.00 |
4.05 |
SG |
0.142 |
0.070 |
0.040 |
0.690 |
10.300 |
137.378 |
-0.890 |
10.150 |
LCS |
2.967 |
2.830 |
2.770a |
0.829 |
-0.231 |
0.156 |
0.440 |
4.860 |
LCA |
1.588 |
1.570 |
1.570 |
0.209 |
-0.040 |
-0.204 |
1.000 |
2.040 |
LEV |
0.162 |
0.150 |
0.000 |
0.141 |
0.661 |
-0.167 |
0.000 |
0.610 |
Measurement of working capital ratios like; inventory turnover period (ITP) shows a mean value of 43.59 days with a standard deviation of 32.25 days. The ITP of the selected companies ranges from 0 to 238.25 days. Similarly, the Average Collection Period (ACP) shows a mean value of 40.47 days with a standard deviation of 69.95 days. ACP for selected companies ranges between 0 to 641.13 days. The Average Payments period (APP) shows a mean value of 35.69 days with a standard deviation of 43.77 days. ACP of the selected companies ranges from 0 to 664.22 days. Further, the mean Cash conversion cycle for selected companies is 48.37 days with a standard deviation of 75.27 days. The CCC ranges from -498.7 to 523.5 days and the majority of the companies have a negative cash conversion cycle because of a liberal accounts collection period. Similarly, the liquidity ratios i.e. the quick ratio (QR) show a mean value of 0.605 with a standard deviation of 0.565. QR of the selected companies ranges from 0 to 4.05 and the majority of the companies have a quick ratio of 0.40. The mean of the Current Ratio (CR) of the selected companies is given by 1.367 with a standard deviation of 0.919. Most of the firms have a current ratio of 0.68 with a median value of 1.14. The current ratio ranges between 0.07 to 6.54.
Correlation Coefficients Analysis
Pearson’s correlation coefficient table which is given in the following table represents key information regarding the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. It is observed that the ROA is significantly negatively related to ITP, ARP and APP, however, the relationship of CCC is not significant. Moreover, leverage is also negatively related to ROA whereas, CR, QR, LCS, LCA and LOC are all positively related to ROA. In addition, multicollinearity issues have been found between measures of working capital such as CCC and ACP with a high correlation coefficient of 0.736. Hence, it was necessary to carry out Hausman’s test to confirm the regression model and it is found that the random-effect model is more appropriate to use on the basis of results obtained from Hausman’s test ([Table 5]).
|
ROA |
ROE |
ITP |
ACP |
APP |
CCC |
CR |
QR |
CAR |
CLR |
WTR |
SG |
LCS |
LCA |
LEV |
ROA |
1 |
||||||||||||||
ROE |
0.554** |
1 |
|||||||||||||
ITP |
-0.248** |
-0.168** |
1 |
||||||||||||
ACP |
-0.153** |
-0.099 |
0.027 |
1 |
|||||||||||
APP |
-0.183** |
0.024 |
0.052 |
0.352** |
1 |
||||||||||
CCC |
-0.141** |
-0.178** |
0.423** |
0.736** |
-.232** |
1 |
|||||||||
CR |
0.205** |
0.072 |
0.078 |
0.289** |
-0.098 |
.359** |
1 |
||||||||
QR |
0.281** |
0.093 |
0.434** |
-0.138* |
-.147** |
.143** |
.633** |
1 |
|||||||
CAR |
0.167** |
0.102 |
-0.029 |
0.374** |
.163** |
.240** |
.601** |
.262** |
1 |
||||||
CLR |
-0.269** |
-0.038 |
0.088 |
0.007 |
.363** |
-.166** |
-.421** |
-.364** |
.195** |
1 |
|||||
WTR |
0.058 |
0.014 |
-0.012 |
-0.022 |
-0.019 |
-0.014 |
0.013 |
0.032 |
0.019 |
-0.012 |
1 |
||||
SG |
0.111* |
0.145** |
-0.131* |
-0.085 |
.248** |
-.279** |
-0.058 |
-0.036 |
0.020 |
0.051 |
0.013 |
1 |
|||
LCS |
0.093 |
0.012 |
-0.101 |
-0.337** |
-.203** |
-.239** |
-.162** |
-0.003 |
-.434** |
-.354** |
0.064 |
-0.072 |
1 |
||
LCA |
0.062 |
0.007 |
0.064 |
-0.146** |
-0.054 |
-0.077 |
-0.094 |
.128* |
-.207** |
-.186** |
0.075 |
-0.099 |
.448** |
1 |
|
LEV |
-0.204** |
-0.075 |
-0.001 |
-0.071 |
-0.077 |
-0.021 |
-.235** |
-.218** |
-.443** |
-.199** |
-0.047 |
0.089 |
.157** |
0.018 |
1 |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
|||||||||||||||
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). |
Random Effect Regression Model
The random effect regression models given in ([Table 6]) explain the relationship between working capital components and financial performance i.e. ROA of all the selected companies. The value of the regression coefficient (β) for ITP, ARP and APP is -0.0004, -0.0004 and -0.0001 are statistically significant as per the random-effects model. Contrarily, CR is significantly more positively predicting the ROA of the selected companies.
Variable |
β |
t |
β |
t |
β |
t |
β |
t |
C |
0.0001 |
0.0025 |
-0.0150 |
-0.3700 |
-0.0170 |
-0.3480 |
-0.0040 |
-0.0710 |
ITP |
-0.0004 |
(-4.7348) ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARP |
|
|
-0.0004 |
(-5.0064) ** |
|
|
|
|
APP |
|
|
|
|
-0.0001 |
(-3.4174) ** |
|
|
CCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.53E-05 |
1.4134 |
CR |
0.0195 |
(3.0441) ** |
0.0419 |
(5.8525) ** |
0.0259 |
(3.9548) ** |
0.0263 |
(3.9510) ** |
QR |
0.0308 |
(2.9433) ** |
-0.0082 |
-0.7396 |
0.0125 |
1.1826 |
0.0158 |
1.4778 |
LCS |
0.0077 |
1.1430 |
0.0056 |
0.8664 |
0.0076 |
0.9989 |
0.0051 |
0.6552 |
LCA |
-0.0101 |
-0.4205 |
-0.0053 |
-0.2328 |
-0.0077 |
-0.2826 |
-0.0192 |
-0.6880 |
LEV |
-0.1232 |
(-5.2709) ** |
-0.1233 |
(-5.2844) ** |
-0.1238 |
(-5.1493) ** |
-0.1195 |
(-4.9397) ** |
LOC |
0.0172 |
(3.4839) ** |
0.0169 |
(3.6408) ** |
0.0180 |
(3.2336) ** |
0.0183 |
(3.1688) ** |
R2 |
0.1926 |
|
0.1974 |
|
0.1776 |
|
0.1626 |
|
Adj. R2 |
0.1803 |
|
0.1852 |
|
0.1650 |
|
0.1498 |
|
F-statistic |
15.6789 |
|
16.1634 |
|
14.1877 |
|
12.7558 |
|
Prob(F-statistic) |
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
Durbin-Watson stat |
1.3585 |
|
1.3712 |
|
1.3540 |
|
1.3543 |
|
Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test |
||||||||
Chi-Sq. Statistic |
71.4360 |
|
65.1916 |
|
58.7544 |
|
61.6432 |
|
Chi-Sq. d.f. |
6.0000 |
|
6.0000 |
|
6.0000 |
|
6.0000 |
|
Prob. |
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
0.0000 |
|
Results and Discussion
The random-effects model shows that only ITP is significantly negatively related to the ROA of the sample companies at a 0.01 level of significance. Similarly, the APP is also negatively yet poorly affecting ROA at a 0.10 level of significance, but it has been found that the firm’s profitability is not significantly affected by ARP and CCC. Also, it has been observed that the liquidity measures CR and QR have a significant positive association with ROA. Further, the size of the companies and leverage are inversely related to ROA but the age of the firms is not significantly affecting their financial performance.
Findings and Implications of the Study
Finally, the results of the research on working capital management and its impact on the financial performance of the BSE-listed cement companies reveal three important findings. First of all, working capital management, especially inventory management, and cash conversion cycle, negatively affects profitability whereas quick ratio and current ratio have a favourable impact on ROA. As such, the working capital turnover ratio was also found to be insignificant in explaining the financial performance of the selected companies. Moreover, the accounts collection period and accounts payable period exhibit a negative relationship with ROA but are not significant. Thus, instead of concentrating more on receivables and payables, cement companies should concentrate on reducing their inventory turnover period and cash conversion cycle on a priority basis. The outcomes of this study of the Indian cement manufacturing sector have been able to substantiate the existing theories and literature on the impact of working capital management on financial performance. These research findings highlight the importance of the inventory turnover period, cash conversion cycle theory, pecking order theory, and agency theory in evaluating the link between WCM and firm performance. The research also built a foundation for future research, allowing academicians to comprehend the connection between working capital management practices and financial performance. To some extent, the findings of the research help governments in their development strategies for enhancing the performance of this particular sector by infusing more liquidity and more infrastructural projects. Since the development of this particular industry is linked with infrastructure development and economic development, effective and favourable investment and developmental strategies need to be framed based on the dependency of profitability on WCM. Further, the data show that effective and efficient WCM especially, the inventory turnover period needs to be looked after for better financial results. Quicker inventory turnover will in turn reduce the cash conversion cycle, which in turn improves liquidity position and financial profitability.
This particular research is based on samples from the Indian cement manufacturing sector. Since business operations and management styles differ greatly across companies, firms as well as countries, the present study provides ample scope for extended research on firms in different economies after taking into account the degree of similarity among these businesses and the sample companies. Further studies might be conducted by categorizing businesses into different group-based company-specific characteristics and examining how these variables impact the relationship between WCM and firm performance. Further, working capital policies are influenced by internal management and control, competition, and technological advancements. Therefore, future studies may investigate the link between WCM and company performance by assessing market competitiveness, internal management control, and the degree of adoption of relevant technologies in the firm in consideration.
Conclusions
The study is designed to analyze working capital management practices and strategies followed in the Indian cement industry and their impact on the financial performance of the companies. In this process, the research analyzed various ratios pertaining to the working capital policy and practices in the selected companies and their impact on the performance to provide useful suggestions to improve the components of working capital for better performance. Its significance includes providing empirically-based guidance to businesses, especially cement industries, to improve their financial performance, including increased profitability only through adopting suitable working capital management strategies, relating to the maintenance of optimal levels of inventories, cash, and receivables.
The study's findings will assist the management of the selected companies by providing better insight into how they may successfully manage their working capital to improve their financial performance. The findings will also contribute to the existing body of knowledge by validating different theories of working capital management for the cement industry. The findings of this study may be beneficial to financial managers and investors in the Indian stock markets while making investment decisions. The study's findings will also aid policymakers and regulators in enacting new working capital management rules and regulations in the industrial sector. The study will also assist the investing community, including security analysts, investment managers, stockbrokers, and other institutional and retail investors, whose understanding of the link between working capital management and financial success is critical for investment analysis.
Source of Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Akoto R, Vitor D, Angmor P. Work capital management and profitability: Evidence from Ghanaian listed manufacturing firms. J Econ Int Finance. 2013;5(9):373-9. [Google Scholar]
- Alshubiri F. The effects of working capital practices on risk management: Evidence from Jordan. Global J Business Res. 2011;5(1):39-54. [Google Scholar]
- Appuhami B. The impact of firms' capital expenditure on working capital management: An empirical study across industries in Thailand. Int Manag Rev. 2008;4(1):8-21. [Google Scholar]
- Dash M, Hanuman R. A liquidity-profitability trade-off model for working capital management. . 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Deloof M. Does working capital management affect the profitability of Belgian firms. J Business Fin Acco. 2003;30(3-4):573-88. [Google Scholar]
- Dhar S. Analysing the impact of working capital management on profitability: A study on DSE listed cement companies in Bangladesh. Glob J Manag Business Res. 2018;26(3):3222-35. [Google Scholar]
- Eljelly A. Liquidity-profitability trade-off: An empirical investigation in an emerging market. Int J Commerce Manag. 2004;14(2):48-61. [Google Scholar]
- Filbeck G, Krueger T. An analysis of working capital management results across industries. Am J Business. 2005;20(2):11-20. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Teruel P, Solano P. Effects of working capital management on SME profitability. Int J Manag Finance. 2007;3(2). [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S, Maji S. Working capital management efficiency: a study on the Indian cement industry. Manag Accountant. 2004;3(4):363-72. [Google Scholar]
- Grabowski B. Financial Management of Inventory. J Small Business Manag. 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Hall C. Total working capital management. AFP Exchange. 2002;22(6):26-32. [Google Scholar]
- Haq I, Sohail M, Zaman K, Alam Z. The relationship between working capital management and profitability: a case study of cement industry in Pakistan. Mediterranean J Soc Sci. 2011;2(2). [Google Scholar]
- Havoutis N. Optimising working capital: The latest solutions. . 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hawawini G, Viallet C, Vora A. Industry influence on corporate working capital decisions. . 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Hoque A, Mia A, Anwar R. Working capital management and profitability: A study on cement industry in Bangladesh. Res J Fin Acc. 2015;6(7):18-28. [Google Scholar]
- Kabuye F, Kato J, Akugizibwe I, Bugambiro N. Internal control systems, working capital management and financial performance of supermarkets. Cogent Business Manag. 2019;6(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Kawakibi A, Hadiwidjojo D. The effect of working capital management on company profits and values (study of cement companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange). Int J Business Econ Law. 2019;20(5):30-7. [Google Scholar]
- Khan SU, Hijazi ST, Kamal Y. Impact of Working Capital Management on Firm‟s Profitability: A Case Study of Cement Industry of Pakistan. Eur Res. 2005;91(2):86-93. [Google Scholar]
- Lazaridis I, Tryfonidis D. Relationship between working capital management and profitability of listed companies in the Athens stock exchange. J Fin Manag Anal. 2006;19(1):26-35. [Google Scholar]
- Li K, Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah I, Antwi S, Bawuah J. Liquidity and firms’ financial performance nexus: panel evidence from non-financial firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange. SAGE Open. 2020;10(3). [Google Scholar]
- Matar A, Eneizan B. Determinants of financial performance in industrial firms: Evidence from Jordan. Asian J Agricul Extension. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad H, Rehman A, Waqas M. The relationship between working capital management and profitability: A case study of the tobacco industry in Pakistan. J Asian Fin. 2016;3(2):13-20. [Google Scholar]
- Nwankwo O, Osho G. An empirical analysis of corporate survival and growth: Evidence from efficient working capital management. Int J Schol Acad Intellectual Diver. 2010;12(1):1-13. [Google Scholar]
- Nwude E, Allison P, Nwude C. The relationship between working capital management and corporate returns cements the industry of emerging markets. Int J Fin Econ. 2020;26(3):3222-35. [Google Scholar]
- Orshi T. Impact of liquidity management on the financial performance of listed food and beverage companies in Nigeria. . 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Padachi K. Trends in working capital management and its impact on firms’ performance: an analysis of Mauritian small manufacturing firms. Int Rev Business Res . 2006;2(2):45-58. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey N, Sabamaithily S. Working capital management on profitability: Cement industry in India. SCMS J Indian Manag. 2016;13(2):81-95. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi C. Working Capital Management and Corporate Profitability: A Panel Data Regression Model Analysis of Indian Cement Companies. Wutan Huatan Jisuan Jishu. 2020;16:245-67. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi A. Negative Working Capital and Profitability - An Empirical Analysis of Indian Cement Companies”. Int J Res Comm Manag. 2013;26(6):41-5. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi A. Cash Conversion Cycle and Firms’ Profitability - A Study of Cement Manufacturing Companies of India”. Int J Curr Res. 2013;26(6):1484-8. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi A. Impact of Working Capital Management on Profitability: A Case Study of ACC Ltd. Asian J Manag. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi A. Relationship between Inventory Management and Profitability - An Empirical Analysis of Indian Cement Companies”. Asia Pacific J Mark Manag Rev. 2013;7:107-20. [Google Scholar]
- Panigrahi A, Sharma A. Working Capital Management and Firms’ Performance: An Analysis of selected Indian Cement Companies”. Asian J Res Business Econ Manag. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Petersen M, Rajan R. Trade credit: theories and evidence.. Rev Fin Stud. 1997;10:661-91. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad P, Sivasankaran N, Shukla A. Impact of deviation from target working capital on firm profitability: evidence from India’s. Int J Prod Performance Manag. 2019;68(8):1510-27. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad P, Sivasankaran N, Paul S, Kannadhasan M. Measuring the impact of working capital efficiency on the financial performance of a firm: An alternative approach. J Indian Business Res. 2019;11(1):75-94. [Google Scholar]
- Quayyum S. Effects of working capital management and liquidity: evidence from the cement Industry of Bangladesh. J Business Technol. 2011;6(1):37-47. [Google Scholar]
- Rehman M, Anjum N. Determination of the impact of working capital management on profitability: an empirical study from the cement sector in Pakistan. Asian Econ Fin Rev. 2013;3(3):319-32. [Google Scholar]
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Research Problem
- Review of Literature
- Research Methodology
- Research Variables and Techniques
- Empirical Analysis
- Correlation Coefficients Analysis
- Random Effect Regression Model
- Results and Discussion
- Findings and Implications of the Study
- Conclusions
- Source of Funding
- Conflicts of Interest
- References
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Panigrahi A. Working capital management strategies and financial performance: A cause-and-effect analysis [Internet]. J Manag Res Anal. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 09];11(1):3-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2024.002
APA
Panigrahi, A. (2024). Working capital management strategies and financial performance: A cause-and-effect analysis. J Manag Res Anal, 11(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2024.002
MLA
Panigrahi, Ashok. "Working capital management strategies and financial performance: A cause-and-effect analysis." J Manag Res Anal, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2024.002
Chicago
Panigrahi, A.. "Working capital management strategies and financial performance: A cause-and-effect analysis." J Manag Res Anal 11, no. 1 (2024): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2024.002